The world’s need is for faster, more focused and more targetted research, scientists say, now that certainty of man-made climate change is established.
By Katherine Bagley
When a United Nations panel of experts released a report last week affirming that man-made climate change is a scientific certainty, skeptics of global warming were noisily trying to discredit the panel. In the process, they drowned out the critiques of a far different group.
A broad array of leading climate scientists and policy specialists were also criticizing the panel for the exact opposite reason: They believe the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear message about the grave threat of warming and to inform policies to address local climate change issues. They say that after 25 years it might be time to overhaul the organization and refocus its research priorities.
"The state of the science and the questions to be answered have changed," said Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research who has worked with the IPCC since the early 1990s.
Ahead of IPCC Climate Report, Skeptic Groups Launch Global Anti-Science Campaign
GOP Lawmakers Hit by Weather Tragedies Stay Mum on Climate Change
All Eyes on Keeling Curve: Scientists Anxious as CO2 Levels to Cross 400 PPM
With Drought Season Off to a Bad Start, Scientists Forecast Another Bleak Year
Sent by gReader Pro